It would be nice to support this scenario:
var number = 5;
var nullableNumber = (int?) 5;
number.Should().Be(nullableNumber);
is better than:
number.Should().Be(nullableNumber.Value)
when nullableNumber is null (we can display a better error message than NullObjectException).
Comments: ** Comment from web user: dennisdoomen **
var number = 5;
var nullableNumber = (int?) 5;
number.Should().Be(nullableNumber);
is better than:
number.Should().Be(nullableNumber.Value)
when nullableNumber is null (we can display a better error message than NullObjectException).
Comments: ** Comment from web user: dennisdoomen **
Will be closed when the release is shipped.