Updated Wiki: Documentation
Supported Test Frameworks Fluent Assertions supports MSTest, NUnit, XUnit and MSpec. You can simply add a reference to the corresponding test framework assembly to the unit test project. Fluent...
View ArticleUpdated Wiki: Documentation
Supported Test Frameworks Fluent Assertions supports MSTest, NUnit, XUnit and MSpec. You can simply add a reference to the corresponding test framework assembly to the unit test project. Fluent...
View ArticleUpdated Wiki: Documentation
Supported Test Frameworks Fluent Assertions supports MSTest, NUnit, XUnit and MSpec. You can simply add a reference to the corresponding test framework assembly to the unit test project. Fluent...
View ArticleUpdated Wiki: Documentation
Supported Test Frameworks Fluent Assertions supports MSTest, NUnit, XUnit and MSpec. You can simply add a reference to the corresponding test framework assembly to the unit test project. Fluent...
View ArticleUpdated Wiki: Documentation
Supported Test Frameworks Fluent Assertions supports MSTest, NUnit, XUnit and MSpec. You can simply add a reference to the corresponding test framework assembly to the unit test project. Fluent...
View ArticleUpdated Wiki: Documentation
Supported Test Frameworks Fluent Assertions supports MSTest, NUnit, XUnit and MSpec. You can simply add a reference to the corresponding test framework assembly to the unit test project. Fluent...
View ArticleUpdated Wiki: Documentation
Supported Test Frameworks Fluent Assertions supports MSTest, NUnit, XUnit and MSpec. You can simply add a reference to the corresponding test framework assembly to the unit test project. Fluent...
View ArticleUpdated Wiki: Documentation
Supported Test Frameworks Fluent Assertions supports MSTest, NUnit, XUnit and MSpec. You can simply add a reference to the corresponding test framework assembly to the unit test project. Fluent...
View ArticleUpdated Wiki: Documentation
Supported Test Frameworks Fluent Assertions supports MSTest, NUnit, XUnit and MSpec. You can simply add a reference to the corresponding test framework assembly to the unit test project. Fluent...
View ArticleUpdated Wiki: Documentation
Supported Test Frameworks Fluent Assertions supports MSTest, NUnit, XUnit and MSpec. You can simply add a reference to the corresponding test framework assembly to the unit test project. Fluent...
View ArticleUpdated Release: Release 1.7.0 (Jan 13, 2012)
What's New Added methods for asserting that a collection of types matching a predicate have specific methods that are virtual or marked with a specific attribute. Added methods for asserting XElements...
View ArticleReleased: Release 1.7.0 (Jan 13, 2012)
What's New Added methods for asserting that a collection of types matching a predicate have specific methods that are virtual or marked with a specific attribute. Added methods for asserting XElements...
View ArticleUpdated Wiki: Documentation
Supported Test Frameworks Fluent Assertions supports MSTest, NUnit, XUnit and MSpec. You can simply add a reference to the corresponding test framework assembly to the unit test project. Fluent...
View ArticleClosed Feature: Support filtering types from an assembly by their namespace...
Allow for:assembly.Types().UnderNamespace("Core.Domain")
View ArticleClosed Issue: Recursive property comparison not always working as expecting...
See http://fluentassertions.codeplex.com/discussions/277551
View ArticleClosed Issue: ignore white spaces leading because message [11421]
When I write a because message starting with "because", FluentAssertions is clever enough to omit the "because" it normally writes of its own.In more complex scenarios, I'd like to preceed the because...
View ArticleClosed Issue: Support assertions on XML elements [11445]
Support assertions on XElement and XAttribute
View ArticleClosed Feature: Support property comparison of objects in collections [11447]
If a property is of a collection type of another object, and recursive comparison is enabled, it should compare the individual objects as well.
View ArticleClosed Issue: Support ComparisonMode.StartWith in validating exception...
Support a new ComparisonMode: 'StartWith' to validate that an exception message starts with a specific text
View Article