Quantcast
Channel: Fluent Assertions
Browsing all 1402 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Source code checked in, #78642

Changed implementation of BeDecoratedWith, to take a predicate for matching the properties.

View Article


Commented Issue: Extend attribute assertions with property checks [12186]

See http://fluentassertions.codeplex.com/discussions/279305 and discussion on...

View Article


Source code checked in, #78672

Layout change

View Article

New Post: CollectionPropertyAssertions

Hm... I can't find CollectionPropertyAssertions in codebase anymore

View Article

New Post: CollectionPropertyAssertions

You're right. I've been completely rewriting the way the structural comparison works for version 2.0 (the trunk). It will be fully extensible and I'll be offering a completely different API for...

View Article


Source code checked in, #78842

Refactoring

View Article

Commented Issue: Extend attribute assertions with property checks [12186]

See http://fluentassertions.codeplex.com/discussions/279305 and discussion on...

View Article

Commented Feature: Exclude properties on nested objects [11841]

We'd like to compare two aggregate roots ignoring a few audit properties (CreatedBy, CreatedOn) on all entities within the root.AllPropertiesBut() only excludes properties on the root object.I think...

View Article


Commented Feature: Exclude properties on nested objects [11841]

We'd like to compare two aggregate roots ignoring a few audit properties (CreatedBy, CreatedOn) on all entities within the root.AllPropertiesBut() only excludes properties on the root object.I think...

View Article


Commented Feature: Exclude properties on nested objects [11841]

We'd like to compare two aggregate roots ignoring a few audit properties (CreatedBy, CreatedOn) on all entities within the root.AllPropertiesBut() only excludes properties on the root object.I think...

View Article

Source code checked in, #78947

WinRT support for ShouldThrow<TException>(this Func<Task> asyncAction, ..)

View Article

Commented Issue: Extend ShouldThrow*() to Func [12148]

Extend the ShouldThrow*() methods for Func<Task> too so you can work with async methods:Func<Task> foo = async () => { await DoSthAsync();...

View Article

Source code checked in, #78979

Included AsyncFunctionExceptionAssertionSpecs in the WinRT specs project

View Article


Commented Issue: Extend ShouldThrow*() to Func [12148]

Extend the ShouldThrow*() methods for Func<Task> too so you can work with async methods:Func<Task> foo = async () => { await DoSthAsync();...

View Article

Source code checked in, #78983

Implemented BeInOrder and NotBeInOrder on collections

View Article


Commented Issue: Add collections.Should().BeInOrder()/NotBeInOrder() [12103]

See http://fluentassertions.codeplex.com/discussions/352038Comments: Associated with changeset 78983: Implemented BeInOrder and NotBeInOrder on collections

View Article

Reviewed: Release 1.7.1 (jun 14, 2012)

Rated 5 Stars (out of 5) - Love the way this API let's you easily do strongly typed assertions.

View Article


New Post: GenericCollectionAssertions BeInOrder/NotBeInOrder

I will create two assertion methods:Should().BeInAscendingOrder()Should().BeInDescendingOrder() I also want to add their counter parts Should().NotBeInAscendingOrder() and...

View Article

Source code checked in, #79061

Renamed collection assertion BeInOrder into BeInAscendingOrder. Also added BeInDescendingOrder.

View Article

Source code checked in, #79062

Small refactoring

View Article
Browsing all 1402 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>